Відео

Any law repugnant to the constitution is what children??That's right..Null and void.The right to keep and bear arms means just that.The only people causing havok with "military weapons"are the gov.

They cannot ban Anything in Common Use. Especially after they have already taken the tax dollers for them

Yes it is👍

There are no arguments. “The right to bear arms shall not be infringed.” That is not only the foundation of our nation, but all of our liberties. 🇺🇸 The only person that can tell you, you can’t have a weapon is the person selling it to you.

Wasn't ready for the Principality of Zeon drop. Big ups.

Dammmmn James, you gets it.

When the wackos ask you why you want a military grade weapon, ask them what army uses an only semi-auto weapon like the AR15.

The Second Amendment is specifically about citizens owning weapons of war to defend themselves against government tyranny.

Up until lately, Americans owned military weapons, often better than what the military had. The Supreme Court will eventually take a case, but only after the case has been fully vetted by lower courts, which is taking FOREVER. The 2nd amendment is always needed. "A government fearful of an armed populace, is deferential to that populace." Not quite the correct quote, but close, I think.

I don't hate half of the country but i can ignore them really easy.

"Except for you, England..." 😆😆😆😆😆

The AR-15 was NOT invented for the military. Time to unsubscribe from you. Very sad with your statement!

Why would the second amendment need to single out individual rifles and pistols by name? It states arms referring to all arms. This wording covers them all without the need to single out model or make. Like it or not, trying to reinterpret the amendment in any way to attempt to subvert and intact any new law stripping this right is tantamount to treason and should be treated as such.

I have the energy.....

You start with incorrect info. Armalite's AR-15 was invented in the 1950s. The Second Amendment was written to recognize and protect the right of citizens' to keep and bear arms insuring the right wouldn't be infringed. Our founders in the Militia Act of 1793 required all able bodied civilian males 17-45 yo except for some public servants to own a military rifle, ammunition and train with it. Current US Code defines the unorganized militia the same group of 18-45 year olds. We should be able to own the same or better arms as the military. You forgot to mention the criteria SCOTUS has used like text, history, tradition, in common use, etc. You shouldn't read anything into the refusal to grant sert to the current cases. None have worked there way thru the system. Check out the Four Boxes Diner channel for accurate info on SCOTUS, federal courts, and the Second Amendment.

The Illinois case is still moving through the system.

They can repeal and abolish the second amendment if they want to, that has no bearing on wether or not I have and keep firearms. We saw how ineffective the awb was from 1994-2004.

I love it when Biden ends up sponsoring videos like this.

The volly gun is by law protected by the second amendment which if a cartridge gun would be considered full auto. It has no use for hunting, it is solely a military arm. The ar 15 was invented for the purpose of small game and pest hunting, it's modern use as a military arm is a secondary result. Thus the second amendment should cover the ar 15 and all arms.

Great video, thank you.

2A doesn't need to protect the AR-15 because ATF regulations have concluded that it's not a gun.

If the founding fathers came back today and saw the AR 15, they would immediately go out and buy one.

I think what should be attacked is the vagueness of the term “assault weapon”. Isn’t ANY weapon (fist, pipe, baseball bat) technically an “assault weapon”?

Spicy, I like it

The AR-15 was invented by Armalite Rifle company and went into production in 1959. There is not one military army in the world that uses the AR-15. The AR-15 is not designed for military use.

If the second goes away, we'll lose the right to think or say whatever we want.

Fuck a crown! Happy fuck kings and queens day!

The 2nd amendment covers bearable arms, such as the AR-15.

I'm out of here. What a idiot.

... from my cold, dead hands ...

So, the title of the video should be: "While the AR-15 _is_ Protected by the Second Amendment, Politics and Tyranny still Obstruct it". Got it.

If All these lawyers trying to "interpret" the second amendment in a way they can take our firearms had half a brain they would know that the founding fathers wanted us to be able to protect ourselves if the government turned them military against society. We aren't going to be beating any modern military force with bolt action rifles. Probably not AR-15s for that matter but we would stand a much better chance.

Don't call me Shirley

"Arms". Come and take it. From my cold, dead hands.

The AR isnt the nextgen KLR, the SAW is.

What about any other semi-auto rifle? I cant help thinking about Canada that banned the AK but was totally ok with the Vz58 with the same exact firepower lol

I can’t believe Americans have allowed the federal government to so restrict our 2A which is a right enshrined in the constitution. We don’t have to pay a $200 tax on any other right. Think about it. We’re literally allowing them to tax us on a God given right. Pisses me off and breaks my heart. We must keep fighting for our rights. For our children’s futures.

If you go by the history of the firearm, the M-16 is a "like-civilian" weapon as the ArmaLite AR-15 _predates_ the M-16.

James, you know this is never going to happen. It is easier to get some judges to "interpret" the law to be what the parties want than it is to get the legislation through. Clarity just ain't happening.

For those anti-gunners and anti-2A people: the AR15 and all modern firearms deserve and require protection in the same way the internet, emails, text messages, and other forms of free speech deserve First Amendment protection, even though those didn't exist in 1776 or 1791.

If the government can have it, the American Citizens should be able to have it. That is what would make America strong, and why our forefathers wrote it in there

I bag 3 deer every year with 62 grain gold dots so.....

You need to see Mark W. Smith's numerous and cogent analyses re 2A, and other Constitutional questions. He discusses not only the issues, but the processes involved, explaining why SCOTUS denied cert at this time to the Iilinois cases - primarily because of the interlocutory state.

The Air Force is unconstitutional because the Constitution only provided for a standing Army and Navy. There were no aircraft at the time of the founding either.

I believe, or at least led to believe, that the first ten amendments to the Constitution known as the Bill of Rights, are interpreted to be individual rights. Why in the fuck then, would the Militia need a guaranteed right to bear arms? In what world does any military of any kind need an amendment to protect its right to arm itself.

The purpose of the 2nd amendment was for civilians to kill public officials who overstepped their power. Which literally happened 10 years after we won independence. The founding fathers pardoned all the people who murdered their local officials because, and here's the important bit, THAT WAS THE POINT OF THE 2ND AMENDMENT.

The 2nd says ARMS.

This is July 4th not April 1st....

The AR-15 is actually more effective in civilian use because civilians face lesser threats than the military. The M-16A4 and M-4 are less effective in military use because machine guns, bombs, artillery, mortars, missiles, and heavy weapons like the MK-19 and M-2 inflict the most casualties.

Dude?